Difference between revisions of "Papers on Economic Agent-Based simulation"

From CSWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
==Modeling Macroeconomies as Open-Ended Dynamic Systems of Interacting Agents==
 
Blake LeBaron and Leigh Tesfatsion
 
 
This article just gives an overview about ACE: what ACE is about and used for. It is not as useful in giving any technical specifics. It states problems of ACE, such as degrees of freedom, the fact that modeling tools may be too rich to fit to data, and that the properties of ACE are not understood well enough to model human behavior. It also lists some things that ACE can model (National economy, financial sector, etc.). Policy makers and how they can use ACE is stated on page 9.
 
 
The article's three criteria for ACE are:
 
1. Model must include appropriate empirically-based taxonomy of agents
 
2. Scale of model must be suitable for particular purpose
 
3. Model specifications must be subject to empirical validation
 
 
You can access this paper [http://www.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/AEAPP2008.LeBaronTesfatsion.ACEMacroModeling.Final.pdf here].
 
 
 
==Constructive Modeling of Decentralized Market Economies: An Agent-Based Computational Economics Approach==
 
==Constructive Modeling of Decentralized Market Economies: An Agent-Based Computational Economics Approach==
 
Presentation given by Leigh Tesfatsion
 
Presentation given by Leigh Tesfatsion

Revision as of 03:03, 1 December 2008

Constructive Modeling of Decentralized Market Economies: An Agent-Based Computational Economics Approach

Presentation given by Leigh Tesfatsion

A presentation on the general working of agent-based economic simulation.

  • Difficulty of modeling real world dynamic economic systems
    • Distributed local interactions
    • Strategic behavior and uncertainty
    • Institutional constraints
  • Previously, assumed everyone rational, so no need to look deeper into cognition and social interactions
  • Agent-Based Computational Economics (ACE)
    • Economic world with various agent types
      • Agents adapt behavior, communicate, learn to complete goals
    • Set initial conditions
    • World develops over time
    • Events driven by agent interaction
  • ACE research
    • Empirical Understanding
      • Explanation for persistently observed empirical regularities
      • Are these trends always observed in the models?
    • Market Design
      • Efficient, fair, and orderly social outcomes?
      • Even if agents try to ‘game’ the system?
    • Qualitative Analysis
      • What are the performance capabilities?
      • Does coordination occur?
  • Starting point
    • Two-sector Walrasian equilibrium economy
      • No imposing equilibrium conditions
      • Agent driven production, pricing, and trading
      • Does equilibrium emerge?
    • Look for market organization
      • How does trading occur?
      • Bilateral or mediated trade?
        • Mediators: brokers (no inventory) and dealers (inventory)
    • Mediated markets: auction (central, clearing houses), OTC (not central, managed by dealers), exchanges (mix)
    • Look for learning behavior
      • Price/quantity discovery process
      • Buyer-seller interaction networks?
        • Long term relationships: trust?
        • Trading
          • Terms of trade
          • Seller-buyer matching
          • Trade
          • Settlement
          • Manage longer term relationships
  • Illustration by Hash-and-Beans economy
    • Learning method can matter
  • Issues
    • Setting initial conditions?
      • Carrying capacity
      • Market clearing
      • Market efficiency
  • Disadvantages
    • Intensive experiments often needed
    • Multi-peak rather than central-tendency outcome distributions can arise
    • Difficult to learn and build platform
  • Advantages
    • Permits systematic study of behavior and markets
    • Can look at interesting problems and get quick feedback

The presentation can be found here.

Introduction to Walrasian General Equilibrium Modeling

Paper by Tesfatsion (8/06/08)

  • Decentralize market economies are complex dynamic systems made up of micro agents taking part in local interactions.
    • This creates global regularities
      • e.g. employment and growth rates, income distributions, market institutions, and social conventions
      • Creates interdependent feedback loops
  • Walrasian equilibrium model common way macroeconomists model the economy
    • Consists of finite profit-maximizing firms, finite consumers with exogenously determined preferences, and a Walrasian Auctioneer
    • 9 Basic Assumptions for Walrasian Equilibrium Model
      • 1)Fixed finite number of consumption and capital goods. All goods are private, excludable, and rival
      • 2)Fixed number of consumer agents with preferences over different bundles of goods and nonnegative initial endowments of capital goods and labor
      • 3)Preferences of consumer can be represented by a utility function
      • 4)Fixed number of firms
      • 5)Income of consumers comes from dividends and sale of services
      • 6)Markets are complete
      • 7)Consumers take prices as given
      • 8)Firms take prices as given
      • 9)All purchase and sale agreements are costlessly arranged and enforced
  • Simple WGE Illustration
    • The market is said to be a Walrasian equilibrium if it satisfies the following four conditions
      • At a specific vector e* comprising consumer supplies and demands for services and consumption goods, firm demands and supplies for services and consumption goods, non negative prices, expected prices, and expected dividends
        • Each consumer is maximizing his utility and each firm is maximizing its profits
        • Expected prices coincide with actual prices and expected dividends coincide with actual dividends
        • Excess supply is greater than or equal to zero
        • The total value of excess supply is zero
  • Pareto Efficiency and the First Welfare Theorem
    • How do we measure a person's welfare?
      • Productive efficiency vs. Pareto-effiency
      • Any Walrasian economy is Pareto efficient
  • Robustness of the WGE
    • The Walrasian general equilibrium model eliminates the need for economic agents to interact strategically
    • Three Questions
      • 1)How might strategic interaction become important if firms set prices for their inputs and outputs?
      • 2)How might expectations and learning rules become important if firms set prices for their inputs and outputs?
        • Information exploitation and exploration
      • 3)How might bankruptcy rules, rationing rules, and inventory management become important if firms set prices for their inputs and outputs?

The paper can be found here.


Non-Walrasian Equilibrium: Illustrative Examples

Paper by Tesfatsion (7/31/08)

  • Do all markets always clear, or can there be equilibrium without total market clearing?
  • Keynesian equilibrium
    • Those with incentive to change state have no power to, those who have power to change stare have no incentive
    • Multiple possible equilibrium states
  • Signaling problems
    • Incomplete signaling
      • Do not signal what future actions might be, so others have to make investment decisions that might be wrong
    • Signaling not credible
      • Even if signal today, not credible unless backed today by purchasing power
  • Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Model
    • Allows disequilibrium, due to shocks
    • Equilibrium would exist without shocks
    • Tends toward equilibrium in the long run
  • Involuntary Unemployment
    • Wage/labor not in equilibrium
    • Those with incentive to change state have no power to, those who have power to change stare have no incentive
      • Unemployment equilibrium
    • Optimism/pessimism about future signals can affect this equilibrium
  • Demand Signaling
    • How do customers signal future demand?
    • Need current purchasing power to
    • Liquidity constraints
    • Clower: liquidity and credit constraints can lead to persistent involuntary unemployment due to signaling problems
      • People can’t work as much as they want
      • Can’t borrow vs. future income
  • Effective Equilibrium
    • Holds given
      • Consumer and firm on effective demand and supply curves
      • All price and dividend expectations are fulfilled
      • Effective supply is at least at great as effective demand
    • Firm as price taker in wage
      • Would not lower unless perceived high employment supply
  • Coordination Failure
    • Mutual gains not realized because no individual has incentive to change from current behavior
    • Can be Nash Equilibrium, but not Pareto efficient

The paper can be found here.


Back to MinSim.