Difference between revisions of "Taps Release"

From CSWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 01:06, 4 August 2006

Before release

  • we document things as much as possible, including screenshots, brief videos, audio examples, and didactic um sampleprojects. Obviously having good documentation is essential. chuckdoc.
  • make examples, maybe dedicating a page for each, and also make a separate page to list the examples.
  • keep fixing bugs [...]
    • pv
    • raw sound control
    • so there are no other bugs that need fixing? um good
  • code cleanup, refactor if beneficial for long time [ui_analysis]
  • refactor the build tree (probably combine treesynth/ts/, v1/, and ui/) [done]
  • rename files add GPL headers [done]

Not necessarily before

  • finish defining and implementing the taps API in chuck
  • sample rate flexibility
  • might as well restructure the treesynth logistics somehow... [august]
  • start PR (post to the major lists: music-dsp, music-ir, etc.)
  • internal release, with presentation to woolworth dwellers
  • keep adding features, especially those on research agenda
  • keep working with composers

SOMETIME BEFORE ICMC

  • release 1.0!!!
  • make a video tutorial
  • massive PR (music-dsp, music-ir, linux-audio-*, microsound, and other experimental music lists, get the composers to help us publicize) (linux. right.)

ICMC and beyond

  • (someone's out of control)
  • killer presentation and continue PR
  • start supporting the user base, which should be giving us feedback to help improve the system/interface etc. (remind any users that this is the real world where they must fend for themselves.)
  • give presentations in local region (NYU, Columbia, Penn, PSU, dorkbot)
  • just the beginning!